The trouble with picking up a bestseller that has been on the
bookshelves of most countries across the globe for a good three and a half
decades is, in my view, one and only one thing- hype. Hype gets to you as
no other thing does, not even a thumping recommendation from someone you know
as someone who reads a lot and, more so, who reads only the good stuff.
For a start, it could be just that feature of the book of having
survived through thirty five long, generation-galloping years on the
bookshelves that makes an impression on you, leading you into believing the
brick-sized monstrosity to be great (the best, the very fucking best!)
and egging you into deeming the publication a classic even before you have
actually set out to read the darn thing.
Of course, thirty five years is no short period to discount this
survival. A billion eyes have scanned through its pages already. They have
scoured its length equally for both loopholes and trivia. A billion opinions
have been formed, a million put into words, posted and published for billion
more eyes to scan through and make something more out of what the author has
originally penned. Rave rants, scathing reviews, essay long critical evaluations,
one-para-maximum final verdicts…. thirty five years! Who are we kidding?
Hype is fucking inevitable.
And then there are the fanboys (including yours truly) to take
care of what remains. Innocent, eager and always revving to publicize
their mentor as some out-of-the-world supernatural being who can fart
thunderstorms and crap gold-plated Rolexes. They are indebted to him for
delivering them from their tepid reality, even if intermittently. And so they
happily wage crusades in his name even as literary debates veer towards the
negatives of their mentor’s writing ability after a point. They don’t care what
the book being discussed is and they don’t want to know so long as they are
able to proclaim him, by the end these discussions, as above the reach of all
criticism (the best, the very fucking best!).
Amen.
So, as I was saying- hype is fucking inevitable.
Which was exactly what struck me as I opened the package
containing my order of Stephen King’s (The) Stand. This was a good five months ago.
The build-up of expectations was so high inside my head that I just couldn’t
bring myself to reading it. What if it didn’t play out the way my
highly anticipating brain wanted it to? What if it was something completely
different from what it was being made out to be in all those public forums
teeming with budding authors and literary majors and plain old English book
lovers?
What if it turned out to be a dud? Not just any dud, a
goddamn fourteen hundred paged uncut extended edition of a dud if you want me
to be blunt about it; all because I couldn’t keep my tail from wagging
at the scent of an air heavy with unjustified expectations.
And so I gave it a snub. I pushed it all the way down to the
bottom of my to-read list, not wanting anything to do with it; that is until a
chance encounter with a movie buff of a friend. It so happened that he had just
finished reading the book.
And I can tell you, after hearing what he had to say about King
based on his experience, around two-thirds of that ginormous pile of
timespan-generated, fanboy-fueled ‘hype’ just went down the crapper.
What he said to me was, (I quote, as is, and he may confirm to
you if I’m anywhere wrong in the wordings, but if theres one thing I’m damn
sure of not getting wrong, it’s his intent)-
I WANT TO CHOKE THAT MOTHERFUCKER. I JUST WANT TO CHOKE THAT
SON-OF-A-BITCH!
This was three months ago. And having been considerably
relieved-as you can see why- of any burden of anticipation, I started reading The
Stand a day after. Of course I had to stop two hundred pages later and put it
aside again, but that would be for different reasons (book weighs a kilo- I
read standing in local trains where commuters are pleasant enough to give you
free acupressure sessions that last throughout the journey-but no free space-
do the math)
The first act of Stephen King’s Stand unravels on a chilling
note. A biological testing facility located on a US army base has been breached
and a deadly mutant virus gets accidentally released. A sentry who realizes
what has happened escapes from the base with his family before it can be sealed
off, but not before he has caught something. Thus begins the contagious spread
of death across the lands of America and the globe, moving from one town to the
other in a form so common that one would not even consider it worth a visit to
the doctor- the flu. Except this flu is unlike any other and doesn’t go down
even as you keep thinking in your folly that one more aspirin will do the trick
and you’ll be up and running in no time. It drags you down instead, till the
very end and chokes you to a slow and painful death. Over the length of Book
One titled Captain Trips (nickname for the virus) you are shown through the
eyes of four key characters how the world as we know it is coming to an end,
with 99% of the human population succumbing to the disease in less than two
weeks.
Book Two deals with the aftermath of the plague, the regrouping
of the immune survivors, and also introduces to us the existence of an opposing
force to this group in the form of Randall Flagg and Co. Notorious for his
capacity to persuade followers into committing violence through fear of him,
Flagg is the personification of pure evil and is set upon destroying those who
haven’t flocked to him after the wipe-out. This section is an arousing build up
towards the final act and ends rightfully with the stage being set for the
ultimate battle between good and evil.
And then we come to Book Three, the final act of The Stand. Which is, essentially, that part of the novel where the author shows you the finger. Period.
As is expected, King gives each of his characters a distinct
background that makes you imagine them with a sharpness only practiced
bull-shitters can conjure in the readers’ mind. King’s heroes are human and yet
far from mediocre - a quiet man working at a small-town gas station who becomes
an unlikely hero, a pregnant teenager newly orphaned by the plague, a deaf-mute
drifter who ends up losing an eye as well (as if being deaf-mute wasn’t enough
misery), an up and coming musician battling self doubt and drug addiction, and
many more. These are people whom you would never associate with heading the
society under ordinary circumstances. Nevertheless, their evolution from being
mere survivors to becoming leaders of the good side is plotted so naturally
that it is nothing but believable. Also, even if you leave out the dozen odd
characters that are relevant to furthering the main arc, there are numerous
cameos in here of characters that even in their single chapter existences,
become either endearing or spite-worthy for the Constant Reader.
The dialogues are sincere and catchy. They are able to bring out
disparity in the roots of the cast without ruining the plot’s tension that is
constantly building. The description of dystopian landscapes is brilliantly
done and on most occasions drives home the point to quite unsettling effect.
But alas!
How saddening it is to see the merits of the author becoming the
cause of his undoing as he pushes the limits and goes overboard in attempting
to create something of epic proportions out of something that is clearly not
meant to be thus. The characters- such loveable characters they are
indeed, and in such great number. How far can a writer stretch his love for
them without swelling up the storyline?
The Stand has multiple subplots that unfold along its length.
Original and rich in detail, these are personal level narratives that make for
gripping reads even if few of them are ended prematurely while a few others
drag too long only to start tasting sour. But, ardent fanboy or not, I must
admit the writing here is so frigging indulgent that you simply stop caring
about how things will end for the protagonists after a point.
Barring the tightly written Book One, there are long drawn
portions here so elaborately stretched to cover for lack of direction that
halfway through Book Two you know the author has pushed himself into a corner
with no place to proceed. King spends so much time in weaving conflict after
impending conflict into the main arc that by the time any of it actually
materializes you are past page twelve hundred and wondering how the fuck is all
this mess going to be cleared up in the little space that is left.
Which brings me to Book Three ironically titled ‘The Stand’,
seeing as the writer himself doesn’t seem to be interested in taking one.
I WANT TO CHOKE THAT MOTHERFUCKER. I WANT TO CHOKE THAT
SON-OF-A-BITCH!
Imagine Lord of the Rings. The end of the world is nigh,
threat from evil, darkness gaining power, good must unite, etcetera etcetera. You
know- the typical spiel. Now, if you compare the Stand’s main arc with LOTR’s,
Book Three would be the epic battle, the final showdown, the clash of opposites.
Good pitted against evil- the good side playing underdogs with
the will-they-won’t-they tag hanging around their necks, the bad
side bursting with overconfidence, the likes of which high school bullies
typically demonstrate.
Of course, a battle must be fought as has been fought over
centuries of mankind’s existence. How else could all these terrifically
elaborated character conflicts littering the first thousand pages be resolved
convincingly? How else but with the cathartic occurrence of an epic
confrontation, akin to the final battle for middle earth where men, elves and
dwarves march against orcs to give Frodo and Sam the time to reach Mount Doom
and destroy the One Ring in its fires?
And so you wait for it to unfurl, temple throbbing in
anticipation.
And keep waiting…
And waiting, until it is page thirteen hundred and sixty you are
staring at, realization suddenly dawning upon you that theres nothing left now
to battle against.
Two pages… one scene. That is all it has taken for King to
finish all conflicts in one pathetic stroke of Deux Ex Machina that reeks of
utter despair and helplessness.
Then its all over.
I felt cheated as hell. Robbed of a month’s time of my real life
that I had spent living with Stu Redman and Fran Goldsmith and Nick Andros and
Larry Underwood, only to get what in the end, again? Gritting teeth and
a splitting headache!
OH I WANT TO CHOKE THAT MOTHER….
I felt conned.
The end is a cop out like no other, taking a blatant turn
towards religion when sticking to the logical and much broader concept of good
versus evil would've been the right way to go- not that King's increasing
reliance on 'God' to move the story along shows itself only at the very end. It
does before, and on many occasions. Yet these earlier references are shrouded
enough to keep you in two minds about the true nature of the force that is
guiding the 'good' side. And perhaps realising that he has no more tricks up
his sleeve that'd allow him to proceed, King drops the shroud altogether in
Book Three, his story now revolving completely around God's plan to destroy
evil, which-not surprisingly- requires human sacrifice.
Randall Flagg, the magical antagonist remains an undercooked pie
throughout the story despite the amount of mystery surrounding his murky roots
and in the end fizzles out with no stage at all to execute the menacing
performance that was being promised from him in Book One and Two. (From what I
have gathered though, Flagg is a recurring character in other novels of the
author including the Dark Tower Series. Would, therefore, prefer to wait some
more before passing a final judgement on him).
Of course, this changes nothing. My awe for our man’s writing
abilities that have been proven time and again to exceed the reader’s
expectations (the best! the very fucking best!) still remains intact and
I continue- as I should- to hold him in high regard for his love for the
written word.
But The Stand has got to be the most disappointing work of
Stephen King that I have read till date. And despite the two thirds of the
‘hype’ around it that went down the crapper thanks to my friend’s review before
I had begun, I am compelled to believe now that the novel has lasted this long
on bookshelves largely because of the author’s name printed on it.
To conclude- Stephen King’s Stand is a bloated piece of
directionless storytelling that deserves to be read by all budding authors, if
not for anything else then to atleast understand how important it is for a
writer to be honest and brutal even while he is editing or re-writing his first
draft.
Allowing your characters to move the story ahead on their own is one thing, but falling head-over-heels in love with them at the cost of the story itself can be truly annoying for a trusting reader.
(PS: To comment on the sloppy editing and bloated nature of an 'Uncut and Extended Edition' of a book seemed pretty unwise. So before I did, I checked for what exactly was it that was added to the original edition. Two hundred and fifty pages, in all... And as it turns out, the additional bits are infact what I loved the most about the book. So my 'stand' on The Stand remains unchanged despite this revelation.)
2 comments:
Ravi, I knew you were good--I had read what you had said about Rushdie's latest; but this is beyond good. I do know a few adjectives, but I will refrain from using them. I will only say that a true fan of the King could have written this, this is perhaps the first time I have seen expletives and rather explicit ones at that being used in such an affectionate manner. The KING is fortunate indeed to command such feelings. Brilliant, incisive, scathing when it needs to be, admiring when that particular portion of the book deserves it--this is an all encompassing review. I can compare it to Percy's review of Emma, which again is a work of art. Doffing hat, Ravi, take a bow--take a BOW!
This piece itself enlightens us so much... It is very long but you have done justice to what you read and felt about it ... Interesting indeed
Post a Comment